What limitations of the study were identified by researchers? Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. Identify the time period for data collection of the study. Individuals aged 65 years and over exhibit a greater prevalence of the problem of multi-morbidity, or sufferance from multiple chronic health conditions, that require a multiplicity of medications for purposes of managing symptoms and preventing future problems. Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide rationale, include examples, and reference content from the studies in your responses. Use the feedback you received from your instructor on these assignments to finalize the critical analysis of each study by making appropriate revisions. Were qualitative methods appropriate to answer the research questions? All sources are authoritative. We’ve got thousands of tutors in different areas of study who are willing to help you with any kind of academic assignment, be it a business, nursing, management, or science paper. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Was institutional review board approval obtained from the agency in which the study was conducted? You will pick one of your approved qualitative studies for this assignment. Refer to “Research Critiques and PICOT Guidelines – Final Draft.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative in the structure of a formal paper. Your email address will not be published. It is unclear how the articles can be used to answer the proposed PICOT question. Please tell the reader about your topic of interest. Have troubles with paper writing? Are the findings valid or an accurate reflection of reality? A., Hughes, C. M., Fahey, T., & Smith, S. M. (2016). The articles demonstrate general support in answering the proposed PICOT question. Patient complexity—including multi-morbidity and polypharmacy, and prescriber complexity—seen in terms of the existence of multiple prescribers, restriction in autonomy, and poor communication were identified in the study as some of the main factors creating complexity in the prescribing setting in which there is a greater chance that potentially inappropriate prescription could possibly take place. The articles demonstrate support in answering the proposed PICOT question. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles presented in the essay is incomplete. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. When a researcher uses the grounded theory method of qualitative inquiry, the researcher may develop a framework or diagram as part of the findings of the study. A partial summary of the method of study for each article is presented. Did the author identify a specific perspective from which the study was developed? What other types of literature did the author include? In a 1,000–1,250 word Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations Examples essay, summarize two qualitative studies, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study. (2016) have conducted a clinically relevant qualitative study to identify factors that potentially influence the occurrence of this clinical problem including the prescription environment complexity, and paternalistic relationships between doctors and patients, as well as the little significance that general practitioners have attached to this growing public health concern. A discussion on ethical considerations of the two articles used in the essay is presented; some detail in needed for accuracy or clarity. Format 10.0% Do you have confidence in the findings? How did the author establish the significance of the study? Thus, further research is needed to develop interventions that address the noted challenges and improve nursing care for elderly persons. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims. Did the literature review include adequate information to build a logical argument? Content 75.0% Argument Logic and Construction 5.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. NRS 433V. For example, did two researchers independently analyze the data and compare their analyses? Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. Revise the PICOT question you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment using the feedback you received from your instructor. Upon recognition of the reality that a limited number of studies have been design to qualitatively explore the phenomenon of potentially inappropriate prescribing, Clyne et al. Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board? There are some omissions or inaccuracies. In a 1,000-1,250 word essay, summarize the study, explain the ways in which the findings might be used in nursing practice, and address ethical considerations associated with the conduct of the study. This gap in knowledge is the research problem. Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. Are the references current? For example, does the author describe maintaining a paper trail of critical decisions that were made during the analysis of the data? Introduction and Background of the Study. Neither of the articles presented use qualitative research. Individuals aged 65 years and over exhibit a greater prevalence of the problem of multi-morbidity, or sufferance from multiple chronic health conditions, that require a multiplicity of medications for purposes of managing symptoms and preventing future problems. It is unclear how the interventions and comparison groups in the articles compare to those identified in the PICOT question. While their focus was on the population of patients in Ireland that were 70 years or older, their application of the quality method was appropriate because the study sought to explore the opinions of general practitioners which, by and large, is a qualitative attribute than can be more effectively explored using the qualitative method. Although the authors have used a broad range of relevant peer-reviewed articles, there is limited or no indication or evaluation of the potential weaknesses of the studies used. Identify the purpose of the study. Are the major variables (independent and dependent variables) identified and defined? Discussion of study results, including findings and implications for nursing practice, is generally presented. A summary of how articles support the PICOT question is presented. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier. Rough Draft Qualitative Research Critique and Ethical Consideration NRS 433. Explain why you are interested in researching this topic. 06/22/2017. Background of study, including problem, significance to nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions, is included but lacks relevant details and explanation.

Güero Davila Real Name, Roblox Piano Sheets Hard, Smallville Netflix Uk, Claire Saffitz Salary, Twix Slogan 2020, Revenge Photo Websites Usa, カレイドスコープ ブログ 誰, Kevin Bloody Wilson Jokes, Snoop Dogg Family Tree, Deno The Re Up Cast,